Works cited

(i)             Quoted: By the Supreme Court of India at four places in its decision in the case of R. RathinamPatnaik v. Union of India & Another (Right to Die Judgment), Judgment Today 1994 (3) S.C. 392, “Should Section 309 Continue on the Statute Book?”

(ii)            Teera Stanton Collet, ”No Hymn, No Sermon- Faith Based Pro Bono Initiatives And the Challenge of Inter- Faith Activities, 72 UMKC L. Rev.328(2003-2004) (Validity of a Gift by a Parent to one His children to the Exclusion of Others: An Islamic View).

(iii)          Stephan Wilske And T. Sciller,” Jurisdiction Over Persons Abducted in Violation of International Law in the Aftermath of United States v. Alwarez-Machain, University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 205  (1998) ( United States v. Alwarez- Machain- A Crtique article).

(iv)          Selected Current Bibliography on Foreign & Comparative Labor Law, Comparative Labor Law Journal, vol. 18,Issue 4( summer 1997), ( Domestic Work as Work: Recognizing Joint Property Rights of Wives article)

(v)            Francois Laren, Bibliography on Criminal Law, 2000, Ottawa, Canada, (Strict Liability in Criminal Law Book).

(vi)          David. P. Bryden,” Redefining Rape”, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol.3 (2000) (Strict Liability in Criminal Law Book).

(vii)        Francois Laren, Selected Bibliography on intention in Criminal Law With Some Elements of Philosophy, Canada (Strict Liability in Criminal Law Book).

(viii)       Benjamin P. Fay, “Individual Versus Society: The Cultural Dynamics of Criminalizing Suicide”, 18 Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, Issue 3(Spring 1995) ( Right to Die Article)

(ix)          AbhishekDubey,” Anti-Conversion Laws: The Conflict Zone of Freedom of Religion,1(2010) JOLT-I, 186-201 ( Forced Conversion Article).

(x)            B.R.Sharma, Anup Sharma, D. Harish, “Abolition & Restoration of section 309, I.P.C- An Overview, Forensic Medicine & Toxicology”(2006), V.7, No.1.( Right to Die article)

(xi)          Suresh V. Nadagoudar, “Need for Death Penalty in India”, Indian Bar Review, Vol. XXIX (1) 2002  (Mandatory Death Sentence Still Continues)

(xii)        AmandeepKaur, “Legislation of Euthanasia in India-  A Critical Analysis”, Law Hearld(2009),( Right to Die- A Critique article)

(xiii)       Iqbal Ali Khan, “Terrorism & Law”, ( Law That Terrorizes Article)

(xiv)       KiranSangam, “ Death Sentence”, 2009(Mandatory Death Sentence Still Continues article)

(xv)        SaadiyaSuleman, “ Freedom of Religion & Anti-Conversion Laws in India- An overview, ILI Law Review (Religious Conversion- Constitutional Implications Book).

(xvi)       Mohd. Salman Waris,” Software Piracy – Need for Regulation”, Asian Cyber Laws Institute, (A Comparative Study of Copyright Law Book).

(xvii)     Mohd. Salman Waris, ”Computer Piracy, Copyright Concerns & Conflicts of Information Technology: Need for an Interactive Approach. (A Comparative Study of Copyright Law Book).

(xviii)   Shrenik,” Right to Information Act”,(2008, ( Freedom of Information Book).

(xix)       Dr. Devinder Singh,” Implementation of Right to Information act 2005: some National & International Experiences”, A.I.R.( Constitutional Issues in Freedom of Information- International & national Perspectives Book)

(xx)        AviralSaxena&ShantanuSahay,” Codified Laws Versus Personal Laws: In Light of Imrana”, ( Notional Integration article)

(xxi)       Mani Shankar Iyer, “Codification of Hindu Law” ( Need for Piecemeal Reforms article).